The Conservative Manifesto:
Because The Right Is Wrong And So Is The Left

A document in progress and subject to change

Cassiel C. MacAvity




----Definitions:
Left wing, Right wing, Liberal, Conservative,
and
The Political Pole and "The Far Right" and "The Far Left".


The three political divisions across the political spectrum:
Left wing liberal, The Conservative, Right wing liberal.

The Left Wing Liberal:
We don't care what your faith or what you do and get done, we demand that you must have the correct identity or correct opposition to some particular identity.

The Right Wing Liberal:
We don't care what your identity or what you do and get done, we demand that you must have the correct faith or correct opposition to some particular faith.

----Noticing that the personal religious experience of an individual is distinct and different from the organizational and rules based mere faith of the right wing liberal

----Noticing left and right wing liberal flip-flops.

The Conservative:
One will do what one and all of the rest of us need to have done.

One leaves things as they are when one and the rest of us need things left as they are.

What faith one claims to believe in, or what mere label one gets identified by, remains irrelevant.


----Business and Taxes: The conservative regulates to support something, the left and right wing liberal regulates to try and ban something.

----Four Analogies,
--------The Lattice
--------The Mirror and the Painting
--------Playing Poker
--------The Powerful and The Weak and The Deluded
--------The Stage

----An Eclectic Summary

----Therefore,
I Am Conservative

----The principle of conservative democracy



Right wing, left wing, liberal, conservative
    For awhile, there was the ongoing and insistent demand that in political divisions there is only The Right Wing and The Left Wing, and that TRW Means Conservative, and that TLW Means Liberal. When hearing the rather frantic claim that there can be only right wing or left wing and nothing else, there is indeed a truth that somehow political discussions do indeed have two very distinct divisions into two particular groups. One of those groups of people is indeed those who are somehow trapped into seeing only a binary left/right---and who then keep mumbling about the horrors of that legendary abomination called the other side.

    In turn, the reality is that for centuries, the political spectrum has always been spread across three distinct groups or clusters, rather than merely two. And only with the French Revolution and the seating patterns that started with the 1789 National Assembly, two of these three groups were given the labels they hold today, being the left wing and the right wing. Absolutely centered and in balance between the right and left wing extremists, permanently leading the left and right wing liberals, is the conservative.

    Thus, when looking at two very distinct divisions into two particular groups, the actual "other" group is those who remain quite comfortable with politics being that wide spectrum from right wing liberal to conservative and then to left wing liberal---or vice versa, to taste. Seeing any attempts to ignore the permanent and ongoing and existent reality of the spectrum of left/conservative/right is a bit fascinating and quite puzzling.

    In the late 20th century and going into the 21st, there has been the recurring attempt to at least try and refer to those "properly" left wing---note the quotes there---as being "Progressive" and "clearly" utterly different from the mere right wing. In turn, there has been the parallel attempt to at least try and refer to those "properly" right wing---note the quotes there---as being "Conservative" and "clearly" utterly different from the mere left wing. And in turn, there has been the additional attempt to at least try and refer to those who are neither right wing or left wing as being "moderate"---note the quotes there---which does as least correctly contrast against the extremist left and right wings.

    And actual reality has been and is the ongoing and blatant problem with all and any of those attempted labels.

The ""Conservatives""---Double quotes deliberate---don't conserve.
The ""Progressives"" don't progress.
And when giving the demonstration of sheer focus and ongoing success, those in between getting called ""Moderate"" aren't the least bit moderate. Instead, we keep being the working example and inspiration for everyone . . . .

    Regarding the labels of liberal and conservative, once upon a time there was indeed the classical liberal and the awareness that the individual achievement is supreme, is not questioned, and there are no alternatives. Once upon a time there was indeed the conservative and the awareness that the collective functioning organization is supreme, is not questioned, and there are no alternatives. Both of these initially apparently conflicting statements are the same and shared statement. All organizations are made of individuals and utterly rely on separate and unique individuals to exist and function. All individuals can only achieve some limited success before needing to assist and be assisted by other organized individuals. In turn, by sometime around the industrial revolution and the rabid scribblings of Karl Marx, et al, that liberal focus on the individual had split in two to become the right wing liberal and left wing liberal, both of them flanking and quite contrasted by the conservative.

The Political Pole
    When noting the confusion provided by erroneously claiming there is only right wing liberal and left wing liberal, a very telling analogy is of the political pole, as a comparison to the planetary north and south poles. In the case of the planetary pole, when one is at one of the poles, all other directions and locations are towards the opposing pole. The same is with the political pole, in this case being any person who is hoping to be THE right wing pole or THE left wing pole, where anything politically different is automatically considered the absolute and opposing extreme and hysterically declared wrong!!, wrong!!, wrong!!, wrong!!, wrong!!, etc.

    The fact of the blatant failure of any right wing liberal pole or left wing liberal pole is underscored anytime that one watches either pole---or both poles---frantically declare that anything conservative must be considered a part of the opposing extreme. When such happens, and when using that analogy of the one way road of all politics, the pole desperately hopes to ignore the reality of the conservative being centered, in balance, and successfully travelling along the middle of the lane, and totally distinct from both of the mere left wing and right wing liberal gutters.

"The Far Right" and "The Far Left"
    Another recurring example of missing the point is the claim of someone or something being "The Far Right", or "The Far Left". Again and as always, the liberal extreme hopes and claims that everything else must be "The Other". Therefore, for the right wing liberal, the conservative is declared to be left wing, which means that the actual left wing is thus "The Far Left Wing". And in turn, for the left wing liberal, the conservative is declared to be right wing, which means that the actual right wing is thus "The Far Right Wing". And the ongoing reality is, of course, that there is no such entity as "The Far Other", there is only each liberal extreme of right and left, each equally and merely flanking the conservative.

    Entire realms of fantasy get declared of both these left and right wing extremes having any sort of primacy over any other variation, or effective difference over the other extreme. While there are indeed particular defining differences, the actual practice of both the right and left wings have been and are to remain merely mirror images of each other. Both scream and posture at each other and past the conservative. Both remain always in perfect unison with each other and far behind the conservative.

The Left Wing Liberal:
    For the left wing liberal and the division from the right wing liberal, the fantasy became that some particular individual identity is supreme and can not be questioned:

We don't care what your faith or what you do and get done, we demand that you must have the correct identity or correct opposition to some particular identity.

    The problem is, of course, which identity??? By the twenty first century that left wing liberal identity could be any of several variations of:

white supremacist
uneducated
under-fifty-years-old
tattooed
straight
socialist
rich
republican
poor
polka-dotted
perceived as working class
over-thirty-years-old
nazi
middle-class
male
left handed
jew
immigrant
government staff
gay
female
educated
descended from parents and grandparents born in the current country
democrat
criminal
black supremacist
And quite a few others.

    The left wing liberal fantasy demands that there must be, basically, total and massive government at all times; that all members of the correct identity can have no restrictions, so therefore the assemblage that is the government must be totally expanded and granted all powers, so that the government will then control and mandate all aspects of all individuals absolutely, except when the particular identity is supposed to dictatorially control and direct all government.

    The left wing liberal fantasy doesn't really make any sense, but the lack of sense doesn't matter as long as the ideology is pure.

The Right Wing Liberal:
    For the right wing liberal and the division from the left wing liberal, the fantasy became that some particular overall organizational faith is supreme and can not be questioned:

We don't care what your identity or what you do and get done, we demand that you must have the correct faith or correct opposition to some particular faith.

   The problem is, of course, which faith??? By the twenty first century, that right wing liberal faith could be any of several versions of:

Ancestor worship
Animism
Atheist
Classical Egyptian gods
Classical Greek gods
Cthulhu
Daesh
Handwaving Vaguely, With Tea Or Coffee And Little Sandwiches
Hinduism
Mithraism
Norse
Orthodox Christianity
Pastafarianism
Protestant Christianity
Roman Catholic Christianity
Satan Worshipping Christianity
Shia Islam
Sunni Islam
And quite a few others.

    The right wing liberal fantasy demands that there be, basically, no government at any time; that all organizations can have no restrictions, so therefore the organization that is the government must be slashed to a mere token fragment, to guarantee that it operates under all restrictions and thus every other organization must therefore become the government, so that the organization will then control and mandate all aspects of all individuals absolutely, except when the government is supposed to dictatorially control and direct all individuals.

    The right wing liberal fantasy doesn't really make any sense, but the lack of sense doesn't matter as long as the ideology is pure.

A Particular Note:
The personal religious experience of an individual is distinct and different from the mere faith, particularly organizational and rules based, of the right wing liberal:
    Such an awareness does note the completely different quality of genuine, personal, individual religion, which by its nature is utterly and complete separate from mere faith.

    In all of these instances, the very definite reality is that mere faith is any version of an organizational practice that can be thought up and claimed by any one person as being certain and factual knowledge, often with notes and commentary, except that such faith, by its completely personal nature, can not be transmitted to any others under any circumstance, except as very tenuous hearsay. A regular feature of faith is endless and ongoing hairsplitting and the making of all encompassing blanket statements, with much arguing back and forth regarding what this aspect of faith involves, or that aspect, where at no point does any provable fact ever occur or ever get referenced in this.

    As a completely different practice, religion is any matter or matters which gets directly experienced by any one person as being certain and factual knowledge, sometimes with notes and commentary, except that such personal religious experience, by its completely personal nature, can not be transmitted to any others under any circumstance, except as very tenuous hearsay. A regular feature of religion is the occurrence of two or more completely separate persons encountering the same genuinely religious experience and arriving at the same conclusions, with the same degree of being able to discuss these with another who has had the same encounter or realization, but again, being unable to transmit any of this knowledge to anyone else, even each other. An actual genuine religious practice, again as opposed to mere faith, remains aware that individual belief and choice remains that of an individual. Of such personal religion, there are no claims or attempts of any demand, of anyone else or regarding anyone else, based on such belief.

    The particular issue with the right wing liberal and demanding mere faith over an actual personal religious practice is that the right wing liberal expects and demands a variety of live action role playing game called Dungeons and Deacons. What is most important to the D&D player is that all are required to show up to be seen playing the game. If there is no actual belief, that doesn't matter. If the D&D game results in harm to individuals or groups, that doesn't matter either. For the right wing liberal, being seen taking part in the declared official occurrence is the only accepted option, regardless of any or all actual issues.

    Again, quite by contrast, for the actual genuine religious practice of the actually religious individual, that is carried out by the individual and doesn't need the sanction of some D&D player. One's actual religious practice is able to be carried out as is called for by that practice, to be known and understood by that individual, as best as such can be understood. Such personal religious practice is and continues to be independent of any and all others who may or will demand that the individual is requited to be told by some D&D player what that practice is or how it occurs.

    And, in turn, if the actual religious practitioner wishes to take part in some D&D occurrence, as part of that individual's personal religious practice, that is perfectly fine. Such participation thus becomes a part of that individual's personal religious practice because doing such is what that individual's personal practice calls for, at that time. At some later time, if not taking part is called for, that also is done. The personal religious practice of the individual remains that practice that is done by that individual and is not infringed upon just because of some mere D&D player faith based demand.

    A handy example of conservative personal and individual religious practice that regularly supercedes mere right wing organized faith would be the concept of the Cooperation Circle as created by Bishop William Swing and the United Religions Initiative (URI).
A URI Cooperation Circle is a self-organizing group of at least seven members from at least three religions, spiritual expressions, or indigenous traditions---including atheists and agnostics. Cooperation Circles work on two levels: by giving people of different backgrounds a chance to work together, and by tackling important community issues their members care about.
    With a Cooperation Circle, someone who is religious can carry out some realization or intent that is inspired by that genuinely personal occurrence of religion. At the same time, when working in a Cooperation Circle, that religious practice has the advantage of filtering out anyone who has only faith and is required by that faith to have nothing to do with anyone outside of that mere faith.

Noticing left and right wing liberal flip-flops.
    One occurrence with both sets of liberals are two groups of liberals who consist of the idealist liberals and the practicing liberals.

    The idealist liberals are those who remain forever right OR left wing, who will never accept anything the least bit conservative or opposing liberal, who remain the useless and ineffective extreme.

    The practicing liberals are those who switch back and forth between right wing AND left wing, depending on circumstance, while also remaining the useless and ineffective extreme. For the practicing left wing liberal, the will of the identity is paramount, as long as that left wing liberal individual gets what that left wing liberal individual wants. For the practicing right wing liberal, the will of the right wing liberal faith is paramount, as long as that right wing liberal individual gets what that right wing liberal individual wants.

    When the organizational faith based point of view of the right wing liberal ends up not being able to get that right wing liberal whatever that right wing liberal wants, then at that point that practicing liberal becomes left wing, where the will of the left wing liberal identity is paramount, as long as that left wing liberal individual gets what that left wing liberal individual wants. In turn, when the left wing liberal gets an organizational faith based position that allows that individual liberal to achieve whatever that liberal wants regardless of the cost to any others, then at that point that practicing liberal becomes right wing, where the will of the right wing liberal faith is paramount, as long as that right wing liberal individual gets what that right wing liberal individual wants.



The Conservative:
    For the conservative, in between these two extremes, the focus is very simple, utterly elegant, and universally comprehensive.

One will do what one and all of the rest of us need to have done.

---Or, noting the reverse as needed:
One leaves things as they are when one and the rest of us need things left as they are.

---In either case, there is the absolute certainty that:
What faith one claims to believe in, or what mere label one gets identified by, remains irrelevant.


Business And Taxes
    The actual practice can sometimes be complicated, but the basic theory is simple. To be conservative, pay your bills and mind your own business. To be liberal---equally right wing liberal or left wing liberal---don't pay your bills and mind everyone else's business.

    When it comes to minding one's own business, the conservative regulates to support something:

    The conservative is in favor of quality roads and transportation, health and safety standards, sturdy bridges and buildings, all for the best support and benefit of all individuals and the people. Conservative government exists to act and decide on a larger scale than can be managed by the individual, acts solely on behalf of the people and not for benefit of government except as to best support and protect the people, acts to best preserve and support the rights, choices, and actions of each individual person. Conservative government does not in the least exist to attempt to prevent those individual actions done by individuals alone. By its own nature, government can only act in general terms, as only an individual can work with another individual.

    The left or right wing liberal regulates to try and ban something:

    In the history of the United States alone, there has been the right wing liberal roaring twenties success called Prohibition. There has been the left wing liberal attempts disarm one and all with a ban on private ownership of firearms. There has been that right wing liberal narcoeconomy success called The War On Drugs. There has been that right wing liberal dismissal of at least a division---over 13,000 people---of trained, career, volunteer members of the military through Don't Ask Don't Tell.

    When it comes to paying the bills, the right wing liberal demands that there be no taxes, and that everyone else pay the taxes. The left wing liberal demands that there be absolutely massive taxes, and that everyone else pay the taxes. The liberal fantasy doesn't really make any sense, but the lack of sense doesn't matter as long as the ideology is pure.

    The Conservative remains aware that taxes exist to support a government. Therefore, for the conservative, the issue with taxes is not how much or how little. The reality, of course, is that the correct level of taxation is enough taxation, and no more, or less. Conservative taxation, therefore, prepares a set budget for a particular year and raises enough taxes to pay for it. When one year's expenses wind up generating a deficit, they get added to the next year's budget and higher taxes until the deficit is paid off. When one year's expenses wind up generating an overly large surplus, the overage gets added to the next year's budget and lower taxes until the surplus is back to a reasonable level.



Four Analogies
    There is a set of analogies that underline the conservative leadership over the mere left and right wing liberal followers, that of The Lattice, and The Mirror and the Painting, and The Powerful and The Weak and the Deluded, and The Stage.

The Lattice
    In the case of The Lattice, the left wing liberal fantasy is that all individuals are individual and independent vines, every vine is required to be utterly equal to every other vine at all times, and there is nothing but vines, everywhere . . . and all these vines thus wind up stuck on the ground, with everyone in everyone else's way, with all being trapped in a quite flat and limited sprawl, achieving little, if anything at all, ultimately finding blatant failure.

    In turn, the right wing liberal fantasy is of everyone together forming the totally massive, monolithic and uniform structure that encompasses and consists of everything . . . . and there is no space, total rigidity, no room for growth, no place to go, achieving little, if anything at all, ultimately finding blatant failure.

    Contrasting with the right and left wing liberal extremes, the conservative sees and seeks out an ever rising and always open lattice, rock solid, ever extending, providing the support for all the vines to rise up in whatever ways and means that all and every vine can thus reach, with the lattice being totally rigid and totally open, so that all have the opportunity to achieve anything and everything, ultimately finding total success in all areas of absolute growth.

The Mirror and the Painting
    With The Mirror and The Painting, the left wing liberal always has a large mirror at hand that the liberal gazes into adoringly, so that on the rare occasion that the left wing liberal actually looks away from the mirror, the left wing liberal can then compare the reflected image with reality, find reality to be deficient, and then demand that reality must be changed to match the image in the mirror.

    Quite in turn, the right wing liberal always has a large idealized painting of The Faith at hand that the liberal gazes into adoringly, so that on the rare occasion that the right wing liberal actually looks away from the painting, the right wing liberal can then compare the painted image with reality, find reality to be deficient, and then demand that reality must be changed to match the image in the painting.

    The conservative doesn't waste time staring into a mirror or a painting. The conservative always looks out at everyone and everything to see everyone and everything as they are, where the conservative then goes about working with and in the ongoing reality as it actually is.

Playing Poker
    When considering a poker game, this is when playing community card poker, the variety of poker with aces beating all other cards, and several cards being shared by all players. With both the right wing liberal and the left wing liberal, each demands to be dealt aces every time, and also demands exclusive use of community card aces. By contrast, the conservative sees what cards are dealt, and works with those cards and the poker variation to get to the best outcome.

The Powerful and The Weak and The Deluded
    With The Powerful and The Weak and the Deluded, the conservative is the Powerful, the right wing liberal is The Weak, and the left wing liberal is The Deluded. For the Weak, the fantasy is to disappear into The Faith, never stand out, always blend in, always be totally aligned with The Faith---regardless of which of the infinite different faiths--- regardless of what fails to get done or who gets hurt. With The Deluded, the fantasy is that The Identity Is Everything, where everything else always revolves around and focuses upon The Identity and always will---regardless of which of the infinite different identities---regardless of what fails to get done or who gets hurt.

    In turn, very, very, simply, The Powerful don't care---Such is certainly a gross oversimplification in general, but equally certainly, when the powerful are compared to the weak and their frantic clustering on some bandwagon, and the deluded and their frantic self promotion based on lies and failure, the summary is apt: The Powerful don't care about faith or identity, the Powerful remain focused on what to do, or to refrain from doing, as noted by the circumstances of the moment, and always for the best benefit and support of absolutely everyone.

The Stage
    With The Stage, that is where all the work gets done, with The Stage being flanked by the left and right wing box seating. For both sets of box seat liberals, there is that incessant demand of My agenda is superior because I say it is superior and I don't have to explain and I have to have it all now!!!!!!!!. In such, the left and right wing liberal has no concept of consequence or how to get anything done except scream and point at the other box seating and hope to ignore the entire expanse of The Stage.

    Those stuck in the box seats keep getting very frustrated when doing the political binary math.---Each box sitter notes being in this box seating with a value of zero, and everyone else is in that other box seating with a value of one. All conservatives are outside of this box seating and therefore---and at that point the binary only mechanism seizes, because of course the conservatives are on The Stage instead of being in the other box seating, the Conservatives are being watched from both the left and right wing box seating instead of being part of either.

    Quite by contrast to that box seating, the conservative goes to and gets all the work done on The Stage, where everything gets looked at, from the left box seats to the stage to the right box seats, everything gets assessed, solutions to issues are proposed and discussed in detail, all that conservative practice that separates the conservative action or inaction from the liberal ideology and thus notes the conservative as being the conservative and providing the leadership.

    Using the United Kingdom in the early twenty-first century as an easy example, to attempt to ignore the reality of The Stage flanked by box seats is even more impossible, because in the UK the conservatives are even The Conservatives. In the UK political spectrum, with the Conservatives being the conservatives and vice versa, on one side is the right wing box seating that is called UKIP, and that lot, and then over on the other side is the left wing box seating that is called Labour, and that lot.



An Eclectic Summary
    Now that we are all in this current time that is reality, as we see the demand of the right wing liberal that the faith based organization and its actions must always take precedence over the individual, such a right wing liberal demand confirms and reminds that the right wing liberal does not reason, does not calculate, does not conserve, and thus the right wing is not and will never be known as conservative.

    Back in that time that no longer exists, when conservative did once mean right wing, there was a particular sense that the best ways did work only for the most people, usually in the form of some specific organization. Whether organizational or individual, changing a demonstrated successful practice only to make changes did indeed lead to failure and to this day still does indeed lead to failure. What has changed is that there are organizations that do not best support the individual, and there are individuals who do not best support organizations, and both of these extremes demand the most harm to everything else.

    There is no Third Way of politics, there is only The Way. The conservative supports and includes everyone, from the center of the political road all the way past both the right and left wing liberal edges of the road, so as to know, to understand, to best help and support every individual. Only the liberal demands that any who cartwheel and crash off the opposing edge of the road must be left to die.

    The claim that someone or something is "Politically Moderate" is a right and left wing liberal fantasy, is the liberals' crude rationalization for the ongoing and perpetual liberal failure to keep and control all the toys. The "accusation" by liberals that the conservative is "pragmatic" is merely the rallying cry of the ideologically pure, the tactically inept, the inevitable failure. The liberal is pure, the conservative succeeds. The liberal writes footnotes for a fantasy of the past, the conservative leads into the future.

    At all times the conservative welcomes attention and discussion, for only that way does refinement and evolution and progress occur. At all times the liberal extreme points past the conservative to the other and opposing extreme, for in that way does the liberal attempt to deflect any self examination and improvement. The ongoing nightmare of the liberal is and will remain someone becoming and being actually aware. Becoming and being aware inevitably moves the individual away from the right or left wing, moves away from the liberal outskirts, extremes, and limitations, to the all encompassing conservative center.

    Contrasting always and absolutely against the left and the right, constantly dragging the right and left into the light of reason, the Conservative continues the ongoing focus upon the entire gathering of all of us discrete and different individuals, and how are we doing, all together.

    The ongoing question asked by and for the conservative is: What will be done by We The People, of We The People, for the good of We The People?



For these reasons presented herein,

I am Conservative.

    I support and refine that which works, and I waste no time in ideology. The only constant is change. I watch all parts and occurrences all the time so that I may continually project into the future and look into the past, learn for myself before events develop, learn what may go wrong, learn what must be prepared for.

    Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.

    When the facts change, I change my mind . . . .




    The conservative notes that every single country is founded by individuals, and every single country is made of and governed by individuals, and every single country and it's government exists and continues to exist solely of and for the individual and the people.

    The conservative notes that at all times and in all places that the correct amount of government is just enough government, that the correct amount of government is the amount that is needed for that time and place, and that the time and place best supports the greatest number of discrete, different individuals.

    Government exists to act and decide on a larger scale than can be managed by the individual, acts solely on behalf of its people and to best preserve and support the rights, choices, and actions of each individual person. Government does not in the least exist to attempt to prevent those individual actions done by individuals alone. By its own nature, government can only act in general terms, as only an individual can work with another individual.

    Taxes paid to support government are charged only to pay for that which assists, helps, and otherwise stays out of the way of any and all individuals. Taxes are paid equally and in equal amount by all, because all support and are supported by the government equally. When the government budget increases, taxes increase. When the government budget decreases, taxes decrease. There is no exception.

    The conservative notes that the best taxation is that which is equal for everyone. When there are different rates of taxation, those with greater amounts of money, and thus greater taxes, always arrange special deals and special circumstances so that they wind up paying as little or even less than those who have less money.

    As greater and greater amounts of knowledge, skill, and understanding are to the greatest benefit of individuals and government, a purpose of the government is to ensure that all individuals have the greatest access to and may make ongoing use of the greatest quality of ongoing education.

    As greater and greater ease and quality is to the benefit of individuals and government, a purpose of government, being for the benefit and support of individuals, is to support and sustain equally each and all together the continuous good personal health of individuals and the people, their sustenance, their housing, their environment and its good condition, the continuous good condition and maintenance of roads and other means of travel, quality employment and the encouragement thereof, quality commerce and the encouragement thereof, quality law and the administration of the courts, the general defense of and among the entirety of the people at all times.

    The responsibility of police and other security is to preserve and protect the general public order and not necessarily any random individual. The personal and ongoing safety of an individual is primarily the concern of that individual, is answered for by that individual, and is not infringed upon. Any arm or weapon is an inanimate and neutral tool just like any other tool, requires knowledge and skill for correct use, and there are no limitations of the safe possession and operation of any arm or weapon by any adult individual. When an individual commits murder, that individual will be executed. When an individual kills in self defense or the defense of another, that was the execution, delivered at that moment. Such an individual may may be compelled to later show cause, where once such is shown, the executioner will not be further infringed.

    Prohibitionism is fraud; Any action and choice that can and will be done by an individual as an individual can be regulated by a government, but will never be banned regardless of any declaration or statute.

    Among the documented and noted prohibitionist liberal failures of various otherwise competent governments are the attempts to ban:
Individual thought and expression.
The creation, sale, and use of particular books, texts, and all other forms of expression.
The creation, sale, and use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs.
The personal ownership, ongoing immediate possession, and use of firearms and other weapons.
The marriage of any two or more consenting human adults.
Abortion.
The various forms of physical manipulation and mutilation.
Assorted social practices.

For the conservative, there are indeed questions and needs regarding regulation, for the purpose of best supporting individuals and individual practice and protection.

    In all of these cases of attempting to prevent any one individual from performing an action that any individual may perform by or upon said individual, the reasoning given may vary but the effort required by any government is not worth the waste of government and individual effort and therefore no such attempt is made by any government at any time.

    If an individual makes the decision to practice any form of self destruction, no other individual can infringe or be infringed in any way. When any individual wishes to create some disruption, that individual answers for that disruption. In turn, if any individual wishes to prepare for the possible disruption caused by any individual, that preparation is not infringed.

    There is no demand that is made of an individual based on a religious choice as all religious choice is solely the decision of an individual alone and no other individual.

    Of regulation and the wills of several individuals, the individual is limited only in that individual's direct and physical effect upon another individual or individuals; The right of one person to wildly swing a limb ends at the presence of another, be that other an adult or a child. The right of one person to bathe in perfume, any sort of smoke, produce noise, practice self impairment, or anything else that will intrude upon or limit another's environment ends at the point of the encounter by that other individual.

    When two or more individuals join together in mutual interest, the requirements of that mutual interest permit the exclusion of another individual who does not share that mutual interest, and the requirements of an individual who does not share that mutual interest permit the exclusion of that mutual interest by that individual.

    When two or more mutual interests come together, they will work together to best further the interests and benefit of the associated individuals for the greatest amount of time, or all such involved mutual interests will fail and be destroyed.

    So as to provide and protect the general future and all future development and growth, the defenseless remain defended and the limitless remain unlimited; Assault a child and die and the executioner may be compelled to later show cause, where once such is shown, the executioner will not be further infringed. As any parent will remind, parenting is the effort and work and active involvement needed to raise a child. To assault and to batter a child is to brutalize the child; parenting is a description of a job, not some mere random privilege. Anyone incapable of practicing or unwilling to practice actual parenting gets no influence over or access to any child.

    In all of this here described, at all times, the Conservative acknowledges that many aspects of being are subtle, detailed, and require careful, reflective, conservative balance of individual and general decision. There is no one decision, and there never will be. Only the left wing or right wing liberal claims that there is only one choice to ever be made, and that is how the liberal fails.

    The practice of and inevitable success of conservative government will continue to supersede and exceed any and all attempts or proclamations by right wing liberals or left, because such success is predicated upon the inevitable success of the practice of the conservative individual and individuals.

Conservative Democracy
    The principle of Conservative democracy is that all government exists solely for the good of the governed; that the branches of government, and all other public institutions are to be maintained so far, and so far only, as they promote the happiness and welfare of the common people; that all who are entrusted with any public function are trustees, not for their own class, but for the nation at large; and that the mass of the people may be trusted so to use electoral power, which should be freely conceded to them, as to support those who are promoting their interests. It is democratic because the welfare of the people is its supreme end; it is Conservative because the institutions of the country are the means by which the end is to be attained.

    Conservative government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute conservative government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.



Home/Index


©Cassiel C. MacAvity

































































--This is just extra space added to let the links work . . .